Introduction to Digital Rights: Why Young People Matter in the Digital Age

These mundane, unmarked moments are the lived reality of digital citizenship for the 1.93 billion children and adolescents under 18 who make up nearly 40% of the global population, 97.2% of whom in China alone report regular internet access, according to the 2024 China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) report. For this cohort, born after the widespread adoption of mobile internet and social media, the digital sphere is not a separate, optional add-on to “real life”: it is the primary context in which they learn, socialize, form identities, exercise agency, and access opportunities. Yet for most of these young digital natives, the rights that govern their online lives remain invisible, unspoken, and poorly understood—by themselves, by the adults tasked with their care, and by the platforms and policymakers that shape the digital environments they inhabit. This gap between the ubiquity of children’s digital participation and the invisibility of their digital rights lies at the core of the challenges and opportunities that define youth digital citizenship in the 21st century.

<!-- 电子版侧边栏：小知识——数字原住民的定义：指在互联网和数字设备普及的环境中成长的一代人，他们从很小的时候就接触并熟练使用数字技术，数字空间是他们生活、学习、社交的核心场景之一，其数字身份与线下身份是深度融合、不可分割的。 -->

The term “digital native” was first coined by education theorist Marc Prensky in 2001 to describe students who “have spent their entire lives surrounded by and using computers, videogames, digital music players, video cams, cell phones, and all the other toys and tools of the digital age.” While early critiques of the term rightly noted that it erases the digital divides that exclude low-income, rural, and disabled youth from full digital participation, the core observation remains accurate for the majority of today’s children: their relationship with digital technology is qualitatively different from that of previous generations. For a child growing up in 2025, a smartphone is not a luxury gadget but a tool as mundane as a pencil or a backpack: it is how they submit homework, text friends, watch educational videos, play games, and access information about their health, their hobbies, and the world around them. A 2023 UNICEF survey of 10–19-year-olds across 18 countries found that 82% of respondents reported using the internet for schoolwork, 78% for social connection, and 62% to access information about issues they care about, from climate change to mental health. For many, the digital space is also a critical site of identity formation: a 2022 study of Chinese adolescents found that 68% of respondents reported that their online social circles and offline social circles overlapped by more than 50%, and 41% said they felt more comfortable expressing their true selves online than in person.

This deep integration of digital life into childhood and adolescence means that the rights that have long been recognized as fundamental to children’s well-being in the physical world now have explicit, unavoidable digital dimensions. The right to privacy, for example, is no longer limited to protecting a child’s physical diary from being read by a sibling: it includes the right to control who can see their social media posts, who can access their location data, and who can collect and use their personal information for advertising or other commercial purposes. The right to freedom of expression extends to a child’s right to post their art, share their opinions on public issues, and participate in online communities without censorship or retaliation, as long as they do not incite harm to others. The right to education now includes the right to access accurate, age-appropriate digital learning resources, free from algorithmic filtering that limits girls’ access to STEM content or low-income youth’s access to advanced coursework. The right to be free from discrimination applies to digital spaces as much as physical ones: a child cannot be denied access to an online learning platform because of their disability, their ethnicity, or their family’s income, and platforms cannot use algorithms to steer children into low-wage, low-mobility career paths based on their gender or socioeconomic status.

The formal recognition of these digital dimensions of children’s rights is a relatively recent development, rooted in decades of advocacy by children’s rights organizations, legal scholars, and youth activists themselves. The 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), the most widely ratified human rights treaty in history, does not explicitly mention the internet or digital technology, but its core principles—including the right to survival and development, the right to participation, and the right to be protected from harm—have been repeatedly interpreted by UN bodies to apply fully to children’s digital lives. In 2021, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child released its first ever general comment on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment, which explicitly recognized 10 core digital rights for children, including the right to privacy, the right to freedom of expression, the right to access information, the right to play and leisure online, and the right to be protected from online exploitation and abuse. This framework has been adopted by more than 60 countries in their national digital policies, and has formed the basis for landmark legislation including the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), the US’s Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and China’s 2023 *Regulations on the Protection of Minors in Cyberspace*—the country’s first comprehensive law dedicated to youth digital rights.

<!-- 纸书注：此处可配插图，展示联合国《儿童权利公约》数字环境一般性意见的核心内容，以及全球主要国家未成年人网络保护法规的对比表格 -->

```mermaid graph TD A[儿童权利核心原则<br/>(生存、发展、参与、受保护)] --> B[数字时代的权利延伸] C[数字技术发展] --> B B --> D[未成年人数字权利体系] D --> E[隐私权] D --> F[表达与参与权] D --> G[数字接入与教育权] D --> H[免受网络伤害权] D --> I[数字财产权] D --> J[免受歧视权] K[法律规制] --> D L[平台伦理设计] --> D M[家庭与学校引导] --> D style A fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px style D fill:#9f9,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px style K fill:#99f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px ```

Despite this progress, the relationship between law, technology, and children’s rights remains deeply fraught, shaped by three core tensions that define the digital era for young people. The first tension is the speed of technological change versus the slowness of legal and regulatory response. Technologies such as generative AI, deepfake tools, and immersive virtual reality environments have evolved far faster than the laws designed to regulate them, leaving children exposed to unprecedented risks with little legal recourse. In 2024, for example, Chinese public security authorities reported a 47% year-on-year increase in cases of deepfake pornography targeting minors, in which perpetrators use AI tools to swap the faces of children onto explicit content and spread it online for extortion or harassment. At the time of writing, no specific law in China explicitly criminalizes the creation or distribution of deepfake content targeting minors, leaving victims with limited options for legal redress. Similar gaps exist globally: a 2023 report by the European Commission found that 62% of AI-powered child protection tools used by European platforms are not regulated by existing privacy or child protection laws, creating risks of mass surveillance of children’s online communications.

The second core tension is between the commercial incentives of digital platforms and the best interests of child users. Most major social media, gaming, and edtech platforms operate on business models that prioritize user engagement and data collection to maximize advertising revenue. For adult users, this model raises concerns about privacy and manipulation; for child users, whose cognitive development is still ongoing and who are less able to recognize persuasive design tactics, the risks are far greater. A 2022 internal study leaked from Meta (the parent comp