导论：租界研究与城市肌理 Analysis / Introduction: Concession Studies and Urban Fabric Analysis

引论：租界研究与城市肌理分析

Introduction: Concession Studies and Urban Fabric Analysis

---

城市史研究从来不是关于城市本身的故事，而始终是关于资本流动、制度变迁与空间生产之间复杂互动的叙事。Shanghai Transformed: The Concession Era and the Making of a Global Metropolis 一书正是在这一方法论自觉的基础上，试图重新审视近代上海的城市发展历程。本书的核心论点是：从1843年开埠到1937年抗日战争全面爆发的近百年间，上海之所以能够从长江入海口的一座中等县城迅速崛起为东亚最重要的国际都市，其根本动力并非单纯的西方殖民扩张或中国本土资本主义的自发成长，而是金融资本、航运贸易与建筑形态三种力量在三螺旋式（triple-helix）的动态互动中共同塑造了城市的物质形态与社会结构。这一分析框架的提出，既是对既有租界研究过度偏重政治外交或社会文化取向的修正，也是将上海城市史纳入全球城市研究（global urban studies）话语体系的尝试。

In urban history, the story of a city is never merely about the city itself; it is always a narrative about the complex interactions among capital flows, institutional transformation, and the production of space. *Shanghai Transformed: The Concession Era and the Making of a Global Metropolis* approaches this methodological self-awareness by reexamining the urban development of modern Shanghai. The central argument of this book is that the fundamental driving force behind Shanghai's rise from a medium-sized county town at the mouth of the Yangtze River to the most important international metropolis in East Asia—during the nearly century-long period from its opening as a treaty port in 1843 to the outbreak of the full-scale Sino-Japanese War in 1937—was neither simple Western colonial expansion nor the spontaneous growth of Chinese indigenous capitalism. Rather, it was the triple-helix dynamic interaction among finance capital, shipping trade, and architectural form that collectively shaped the city's physical morphology and social structure. This analytical framework represents both a correction to existing concession studies that have overly emphasized political-diplomatic or socio-cultural approaches, and an attempt to situate Shanghai's urban history within the discourse of global urban studies.

---

一、租界概念的历史语境与学术演进

Part One: The Historical Context and Academic Evolution of the Concession Concept

讨论上海租界，首先必须面对的是一个术语学（terminology）上的复杂问题。在中英文文献中，“租界”一词实际上对应着多个相互关联但又不完全等同的概念：concession、settlement、foreign concession、international settlement，以及后来的自由市（free city）等。这些术语的使用往往因历史时期、论述语境和研究者立场的不同而呈现出微妙的差异。

To discuss Shanghai's concessions, one must first confront a terminological complexity. In both Chinese and English literature, the term "租界" actually corresponds to multiple interrelated yet not entirely synonymous concepts: concession, settlement, foreign concession, international settlement, and later free city, among others. The usage of these terms often exhibits subtle differences depending on historical period, discursive context, and the researcher's position.

从制度史的角度来看，上海租界的形成经历了三个明显的阶段。第一阶段为1843至1845年的萌芽期。1842年《南京条约》签订后，上海于次年11月正式开埠。1845年11月颁布的《土地章程》（Land Regulations）标志着第一块租界的诞生——英租界（British Settlement）的正式划定。这份由苏松太道宫慕久与英国领事巴富尔（George Balfour）协商制定的章程，表面上是一份关于土地租赁的管理规定，实际上却为外国人在华居留、贸易和建立社区提供了制度框架。尽管章程明确规定了中国政府的管辖权，但其中关于外人不得建造围墙以隔离社区、租地须成片均匀、不许划作工房栈房专受华商等条款，已经预示了日后外国社区自我管理的趋向。

From the perspective of institutional history, the formation of Shanghai's concessions underwent three distinct phases. The first phase, from 1843 to 1845, was the萌芽期 (germination period). Following the signing of the Treaty of Nanking in 1842, Shanghai was formally opened as a treaty port in November of the following year. The promulgation of the Land Regulations in November 1845 marked the birth of the first concession—the official demarcation of the British Settlement. This document, negotiated between Gong Mujiu, the Chinese official responsible for the Shanghai region, and British Consul George Balfour, ostensibly a regulation governing land leasing, in effect provided an institutional framework for foreigners' residence, trade, and community establishment in China. Although the regulations explicitly affirmed Chinese governmental jurisdiction, provisions prohibiting foreigners from building walls to separate their communities, requiring land leases to be contiguous and uniform, and forbidding the designation of areas exclusively for factories and warehouses that would serve Chinese merchants, already foreshadowed the trend toward self-governance in foreign communities.

第二阶段为1848至1863年的扩张与分化期。1848年，美国圣公会传教士发生了擅自闯入青浦县城的“青浦教案”，虽然这一事件最终以清政府道歉赔款告终，但却成为美国获得在上海建立租界权利的借口——美国政府援引最惠国待遇条款，要求享有与英国同等的租界特权。1848年，美国传教士文惠廉（William J. Boone）在苏州河北岸虹口地区建立美租界的努力初步实现。1854年，趁太平天国起义造成的混乱局势，英、美、法三国趁势修改《土地章程》，获得了更大的自治权力，包括成立工部局（Shanghai Municipal Council）作为实质性的市政管理机构，以及建立巡捕房（police force）维持治安。这一时期的制度变迁奠定了租界自治的基础框架，但也埋下了三国租界日后分合不定的伏笔。

The second phase, from 1848 to 1863, was a period of expansion and differentiation. In 1848, the "Qingpu Incident" occurred when an American Episcopal missionary arbitrarily entered the Qingpu County town. Although this incident ultimately concluded with the Qing government's apology and compensation, it became a pretext for the United States to obtain the right to establish a concession in Shanghai—the American government invoked the most-favored-nation clause to demand equal concession privileges as Britain. In 1848, American missionary William J. Boone's efforts to establish an American concession on the north bank of the Suzhou Creek in Hongkew (Hongkou) were initially realized. In 1854, taking advantage of the chaos caused by the Taiping Rebellion, Britain, the United States, and France took the opportunity to revise the Land Regulations, obtaining greater autonomy, including the establishment of the Shanghai Municipal Council as the de facto municipal administrative body and a police force to maintain order. This period of institutional change established the foundational framework for concession self-governance, but also planted the seeds for the uncertain future merging and separation of the three national concessions.

第三阶段为1863至1899年的合并与成熟期。1863年，美租界正式与英租界合并为英美租界（又称公共租界，International Settlement），法租界则保持独立。这一格局一直维持到1899年公共租界大规模扩张、正式更名 International Settlement 为止。在此期间，租界的制度建设趋于完善：工部局职能不断扩充，从最初的土地管理扩展到道路维护、公共卫生、灯火照明、教育文化等市政服务的各个领域；税务司制度（the customs system）的建立使得中国政府对租界内进出口贸易仍保有一定的税收主权，尽管这一权力长期由外国税务司掌控；与此同时，华人参政运动的兴起和早期地方自治的尝试也在租界内部催生了新的政治张力。

The third phase, from 1863 to 1899, was the period of merger and maturation. In 1863, the American Settlement was formally merged with the British Settlement to form the Anglo-American Settlement (also called the International Settlement), while the French Concession remained independent. This structure persisted until the large-scale expansion of the International Settlement in 1899 and its formal renaming. During this period, institutional development in the concessions became more sophisticated: the functions of the Municipal Council continuously expanded, from initial land management to municipal services including road maintenance, public sanitation, street lighting, education, and culture. The establishment of the customs system ensured that the Chinese government retained some degree of sovereign authority over import and export taxation within the concessions, although this power was long controlled by foreign customs commissioners. Simultaneously, the rise of the Chinese public participation movement and early attempts at local self-governance generated new political tensions within the concessions.

学术史上，对租界的研究大致经历了从外交政治史向社会文化史、再向空间研究转向的演变过程。20世纪上半叶，中外学者对租界的关注主要集中在制度层面：《南京条约》、《天津条约》、《北京条约》等不平等条约体系的形成与修订，工部局与公董局（French Municipal Council）的组织架构演变，租界与清政府及后来的民国政府之间的管辖权争议，均是这一时期的研究焦点。费正清（John King Fairbank）主编的《剑桥中国史》（*The Cambridge History of China*）相关卷册，以及徐中约（Immanuel C. Y. Hsu）的 *The Rise of Modern China*，都对近代中国的条约体系与通商口岸制度有详尽的论述。

In academic history, research on the concessions has undergone an evolution from diplomatic-political history to socio-cultural history, and then to a spatial turn. During the first half of the twentieth century, Chinese and foreign scholars focused primarily on the institutional dimensions of the concessions: the formation and revision of the unequal treaty system including the Treaty of Nanking, the Treaty of Tientsin, and the Convention of Peking; the organizational evolution